Yeast Protein Research Library

A structured index that keeps human, animal, laboratory, ex-vivo and modeled evidence visibly distinct.

Scientifically reviewed: September 25, 2026

Every record includes design, model, intervention, comparator, findings, limitations, funding and conflict disclosures.
HUMAN RCT

Effect of Yeast Protein on Muscle Mass and Performance in an Adult Population – a Double Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Total and trunk lean mass increased from baseline in both protein groups, with effects particularly apparent among participants with lower habitual protein intake.

Model
Adults completing a supervised resistance-training program
Sample
79 completers
Intervention
40 g/day yeast protein · 8 weeks
Comparator
Whey protein and maltodextrin placebo

Briskey D, Skinner RA, Zhang H, Chen Z, Rao A · 2024 · Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 12(5):292–300

DOI 10.12691/jfnr-12-5-9 ↗
What this study tells us

Total and trunk lean mass increased from baseline in both protein groups, with effects particularly apparent among participants with lower habitual protein intake.

What it does not tell us

Short duration; completer analysis; baseline-to-follow-up changes do not by themselves establish universal superiority or equivalence.

Funding & conflicts

Yeast-protein ingredients and industry participation were reported; interpret alongside study design. Authors included affiliations with Angel Yeast and Nutrition Care Pharmaceuticals.

HUMAN RCT

The Impact of Oral Whey Protein and Yeast Protein Supplementation for 6 Months on Skeletal Muscle Mass, Strength, and Function in the Elderly

Walking speed and SPPB improved more in supplemented groups than control. Muscle mass and handgrip strength showed no significant between-group differences.

Model
Community-dwelling Chinese adults aged 60 and older
Sample
92 randomized
Intervention
20 g/day yeast or whey powder (about 15–16 g protein) · 24 weeks
Comparator
Whey protein and unsupplemented control

Bai Huijing et al. · 2026 · Food Science & Nutrition 14:e71552

DOI 10.1002/fsn3.71552 ↗
What this study tells us

Walking speed and SPPB improved more in supplemented groups than control. Muscle mass and handgrip strength showed no significant between-group differences.

What it does not tell us

Participants were not blinded to supplementation versus control; no placebo for control; one setting and population.

Funding & conflicts

Angel Nutritional Fund. The article reports no conflict of interest; the ingredient was supplied by Angel Yeast Co., Ltd.

ANIMAL + IN VITRO

Evaluation of the nutritional quality of yeast protein in comparison to animal and plant proteins using growing rats and INFOGEST model

Yeast protein had a strong indispensable-amino-acid profile, but lower measured true protein and ileal amino-acid digestibility than comparison proteins in this experiment.

Model
Growing rats and a standardized laboratory digestion model
Sample
Preclinical experiment
Intervention
Yeast protein isolate · Study-specific
Comparator
Whey concentrate/isolate, soy, wheat and pea isolates

Cao X, Liu H, Yang M, Mao K, Wang X, Chen Z, Ran M, Hao L · 2025 · Food Chemistry

DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141178 ↗
What this study tells us

Yeast protein had a strong indispensable-amino-acid profile, but lower measured true protein and ileal amino-acid digestibility than comparison proteins in this experiment.

What it does not tell us

Animal and laboratory results cannot be assumed to predict human digestion; one ingredient and processing method.

Funding & conflicts

See full article funding statement. Ingredients were obtained from Angel Nutritech; see publisher record for full declarations.

IN VITRO

Research on the release and absorption regularities of free amino acids and peptides in vitro digestion of yeast protein

One protocol reported 97.66% digestibility for the tested yeast protein, close to whey isolate, with model-specific amino-acid and peptide release patterns.

Model
INFOGEST, dynamic digestion and Caco-2 cell transport models
Sample
Laboratory experiment
Intervention
Yeast protein · Laboratory protocol
Comparator
Whey, pea and soy proteins

Qiao K et al. · 2025 · Food Chemistry

DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144176 ↗
What this study tells us

One protocol reported 97.66% digestibility for the tested yeast protein, close to whey isolate, with model-specific amino-acid and peptide release patterns.

What it does not tell us

Laboratory digestibility and cell transport are not clinical absorption or health outcomes in living people.

Funding & conflicts

See full article funding statement. See publisher record for author declarations.

IN VITRO

In vitro human gastrointestinal digestibility and colonic fermentation of edible yeast-based protein

The tested yeast protein showed comparable in-vitro digestibility and a distinct fermentation and metabolomic profile.

Model
Simulated human gastrointestinal digestion and colonic fermentation
Sample
Laboratory experiment
Intervention
Edible yeast-based protein · Laboratory protocol
Comparator
Whey and casein

Caron J et al. · 2025 · Food Research International 208:116098

DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116098 ↗
What this study tells us

The tested yeast protein showed comparable in-vitro digestibility and a distinct fermentation and metabolomic profile.

What it does not tell us

Does not prove equivalent absorption, tolerance or health effects in living humans.

Funding & conflicts

See full article funding statement. See publisher record for author declarations.

EX VIVO HUMAN MICROBIOTA

Yeast protein modulates metabolites derived from the human gut microbiota of older male adults ex vivo

Proteins produced different microbial and metabolite profiles. Yeast increased several butyrate-associated taxa, showed favorable barrier measures and relatively low gas in the model.

Model
Microbiota from six men aged 50–65 in an experimental gut system
Sample
6 donors
Intervention
Yeast protein applied to the model · Ex-vivo protocol
Comparator
Whey and soy protein

Van den Abbeele P, Vu LD, Poppe J, van Hengel IAJ, Baudot A, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Yan J · 2026 · Frontiers in Microbiology 16:1697734

DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1697734 ↗
What this study tells us

Proteins produced different microbial and metabolite profiles. Yeast increased several butyrate-associated taxa, showed favorable barrier measures and relatively low gas in the model.

What it does not tell us

Not a human feeding trial; symptoms and clinical outcomes were not measured.

Funding & conflicts

Supported through industry-linked research; see article statement. Several authors were employees of Cryptobiotix SA or Angel Yeast Co., Ltd.

LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT

Life-cycle assessment of yeast-based single-cell protein production with oat processing side-stream

The yeast scenario had lower land-use impact than soy, but higher impacts in several other categories; energy production contributed substantially.

Model
Modeled production scenario using an oat-processing side stream
Sample
Environmental model
Intervention
Not applicable · Modeled life cycle
Comparator
Soy-protein production scenario

Kobayashi Y et al. · 2023 · Science of the Total Environment 873:162318

DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162318 ↗
What this study tells us

The yeast scenario had lower land-use impact than soy, but higher impacts in several other categories; energy production contributed substantially.

What it does not tell us

Results depend on system boundaries, feedstock, geography, energy mix and modeled assumptions.

Funding & conflicts

See full article funding statement. See publisher record for author declarations.